I would like to thank the many people who provided input to make this summary possible. Special thanks go out to Joe Butt and Marina Margaret Heiss for their extensive suggestions and contributions.
As we look around us, we observe the great variety of personality traits among people. For example, some people are very outgoing and fun-oriented, while other people are more quiet and introspective. It is from these observations one can confidently say that everybody is gifted with a unique personality.
The question arises: "Can we model, at least approximately, human personality?" A related question is: "If we can model human personality, does such a model have any value or interest?"
In the physical world scientists are always trying to model nature. For example, physicists have developed several theories (e.g., relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.) in an an attempt to do this. It is clear that these theories are not yet complete (there is no accepted Grand Unified Theory yet), yet physicists do use these "incomplete" models to quite accurately describe (and predict!) what is observed in nature.
The same holds true for personality modeling. There are many personality models that have been developed from the beginning of recorded history, all of which have their strengths and shortcomings. No "true" model of human personality has yet been developed, and one can argue fairly convincingly that human personality is just too complex of an animal to ever be able to model perfectly. However, the models that have been developed do seem to approximately and reasonably model human personality to an accuracy that makes them useful and predictive. This last point, admittedly, is one of current debate by psychologists and non-psychologist alike (e.g., what is "reasonable accuracy"?).
So, assuming, that we can model human personality with "reasonable accuracy", what value would such a model have? I can see two values:
Of course, just as the known models (laws) of physics are a double-edged sword, that is, they can be used for destructive as well as constructive purposes, so too, can personality models be used in a similar manner - for good and for not-so-good. Does the possible misuse of personality models therefore make them unfit for use? I think not, but I do know many people who are extremely uncomfortable with typing or modeling human personality for the very reason of abuse or misuse. Of course, this whole summary of one particular personality system makes the assumption, by its very existence, that the benefits of personality modeling far outweigh the hazards. I'll let you be the final judge of this.
The personality system presented here is known formally as "Jung's theory of personality type" (hereafter referred to as "personality type/types/typing"), first developed by Carl Jung in the early 1920's and more recently resurrected and made into a practical instrument by Myers and Briggs. Sometimes, this system is referred to as the "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator" (or MBTI), but in a rigorous sense, the MBTI is a particular test vehicle for personality typing.
Personality typing is not used nor studied much within the psychiatric and research/academic psychological community because it is, first of all, rejected by some schools of thought on basic philosophical grounds (e.g., cognitive psychology). Also, many counseling psychologists don't find it useful for their purposes because it does not measure mental health. But this doesn't mean that practicing psychologists eschew personality typing - many counselors do use this system for their patients/clients, particularly for helping people to "find themselves" and similar, non-mental health related purposes.
Outside of the psychological community, however, personality typing (typified by the MBTI) is the most widely-used model of human personality. It is used extensively in career counseling and development, business and education. Its penetration into these areas stems partly from the fact that it does not touch upon the tricky aspect of mental health, which is better dealt with by trained counseling psychologists and psychiatrists.
In a nutshell, personality typing essentially assumes that our whole personality can be divided into four orthogonal (or independent) areas or scales: energizing, attending, deciding, and living (defined in detail below). Within each scale we have a preference for one of two opposites that define the scale (also described below). This makes for a total of 16 different combinations (2x2x2x2), each of which defines one particular and unique personality type.
This summary will cover the following subjects:
I hope you enjoy the wonderful world of personality typing as much as I do. Give it a test drive. You just may find it: fun, challenging, significant, and useful.
And have a good day (typical 'NF' closing, see below).
Jon Noring Internet: noring@netcom.com
(btw, please do subscribe to the Usenet newsgroup 'alt.psychology.personality'. There's discussion there about personality typing. If you have anonymous ftp access, you can also get this file and similar files from site netcom.com (192.100.81.100) in subdirectory /pub/noring/personality/*)
In each of the following four scales, every person usually has a preference
for one of the two opposite choices (designated by a letter). This does not
mean that they do one at the exclusion for the other - most people go both
ways depending on the circumstances. But most people usually do have an
overall preference. Where a person does not perceive of a clear and
resounding preference, the letter 'X' is used to designate this "I don't know"
condition.
Important note: the following scale descriptions are simplifications (and
perilously close to over-simplification) of quite complex, rigorous, deep and
hard-to-understand descriptions presented by Jung (see recommended literature
section for references).
Extroversion (E)- Preference for drawing energy from the outside
world of people, activities or things.
Introversion (I)- Preference for drawing energy from one's internal
world of ideas, emotions, or impressions.
[Note: In a deeper sense, energizing is only one facet of this
scale -- it's really a measure of a person's whole orientation
towards either the inner world (I) or the outer world (E).]
Sensing (S)- Preference for taking in information through the five
senses and noticing what is actual.
Intuition (N)- Preference for taking in information through a "sixth
sense" and noticing what might be. Jung calls this
"unconscious perceiving"
There seems to be a definite vocabulary associated with each preference for
the four scales. By reading the word list on the left and on the right for
each scale, and determining which list you like the sounds and/or meanings
of the words better, may indicate your preference for that scale. This
vocabulary list will also help you to better understand what the four scales
actually measure or denote.
Also included with each scale is the percentages of the total population (in
Western culture) who hold that preference; studies have shown the four scales
to be essentially independent of one another (or to be orthogonal, that is,
to lack any statistical correlation between them).
The two preferences for each of the four scales give 16 different combinations
(2x2x2x2). If one includes the 'X' preference (which means either the person
has no clear-cut preference, or that they don't know it yet), there can be as
many as 81 different combinations. However, each 'X' preference is usually
handled by blending and/or closely studying the two associated preferences.
The order of designating the letters is done as:
Energizing:Attending:Deciding:Living .
Here's a summary of the overall personality for each of the 16 types as
determined from various studies:
ENFJ: "Pedagogue" Outstanding leader of groups. Can be aggressive at
helping others to be the best that they can be. 5% of the total
population.
INFJ: "Author" Strong drive and enjoyment to help others. Complex
personality. 1% of the total population.
ENFP: "/dOCUMENTS/JOURnalist" Uncanny sense of the motivations of others. Life is an
exciting drama. 5% of the total population.
INFP: "Questor" High capacity for caring. Calm and pleasant face to the
world. High sense of honor derived from internal values. 1% of the
total population.
ENTJ: "Field Marshall" The basic driving force and need is to lead. Tend
to seek a position of responsibility and enjoys being an executive.
5% of the total population.
INTJ: "Scientist" Most self-confident and pragmatic of all the types.
Decisions come very easily. A builder of systems and the applier of
theoretical models. 1% of the total population.
ENTP: "Inventor" Enthusiastic interest in everything and always sensitive
to possibilities. Non-conformist and innovative. 5% of the total
population.
INTP: "Architect" Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily
discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists
primarily to be understood. 1% of the total population.
ESTJ: "Administrator" Much in touch with the external environment. Very
responsible. Pillar of strength. 13% of the total population.
ISTJ: "Trustee" Decisiveness in practical affairs. Guardian of time-
honored institutions. Dependable. 6% of the total population.
ESFJ: "Seller" Most sociable of all types. Nurturer of harmony.
Outstanding host or hostesses. 13% of the total population.
ISFJ: "Conservator" Desires to be of service and to minister to individual
needs - very loyal. 6% of the total population.
ESTP: "Promotor" Action! When present, things begin to happen. Fiercely
competitive. Entrepreneur. Often uses shock effect to get attention.
Negotiator par excellence. 13% of the total population.
ESFP: "Entertainer" Radiates attractive warmth and optimism. Smooth, witty,
charming, clever. Fun to be with. Very generous. 13% of the total
population.
ISTP: "Artisan" Impulsive action. Life should be of impulse rather than
of purpose. Action is an end to itself. Fearless, craves excitement,
master of tools. 5% of the total population.
ISFP: "Artist" Interested in the fine arts. Expression primarily through
action or art form. The senses are keener than in other types. 5% of
the total population.
There are other systems that have been developed to model human personality.
The most well-known and oft-used ones are those that divide human personality
into four major groups or temperaments. Hippocrates in ancient Greece
described the first four temperament system, also known as the "Four Humours":
sanguine, melancholic, choleric, and phlegmatic. More recently, Keirsey and
Bates took the sixteen personality types and categorized them into four
recognizable temperaments based on certain combinations of three of the four
scales: SJ, SP, NT, and NF. In addition, they named each temperament after
a Greek god who, from mythological legends, best exemplifies the personality
attributes of that temperament: Epimetheus (SJ - "Hindsight"), Dionysius
(SP - "Let's Drink Wine"), Prometheus (NT - "Foresight"), and Apollo (NF -
"Reach for the Sky").
There is some correlation and overlap between the Hippocratic Humours and the
Keirsey-Bates temperaments, but the fit is nowhere near perfect. To
complicate matters, the commonly understood definitions of the Hippocratic
humours have themselves changed over time; there is no commonly agreed to
definition. It is an area of sharp disagreement as my e-mail attests. Thus,
I will focus on the Keirsey-Bates system, and try, best as I can, to correlate
it to a modern definition of the four Hippocratic Humours (as defined in
the book "Personality Plus", by Florence Littauer). By the way, the more
traditional interpretation of the Hippocratic Humours differs from the modern
one mainly in that the Melancholic and Phlegmatic are essentially reversed.
I welcome input to further clarify the correlation between the Keirsey-Bates
temperaments and the Hippocratic temperaments.
The Keirsey-Bates system is summarized as follows: (Note: The lists of
focus/needs/beliefs/behaviors for each temperament is an aggregate list;
this means that any one person of that temperament will probably exhibit
or have only some of these attributes. The other two scales plays a role
in this.)
Key Focus/Emotional Need: Responsibility, Tradition and/or To Maintain Order
Beliefs/behaviors
Key Focus/Emotional Need: Freedom, Independence, Spontaneity and/or
To Have Fun
Beliefs/behaviors
Key Focus/Emotional Need: Competence, Knowledge, and/or To Lead and Control
Beliefs/behaviors
Key Focus/Emotional Need: Search for Self, and/or Peace and Harmony
Beliefs/behaviors
One of the more widely known books describing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
It includes a self-test (many do not consider it to be as good as the "real"
MBTI test).
The real Please Understand Me, from the horse's mouth (i.e., the daughter
in the original mother/daughter pair). A good bridge between Jung and PUM,
but no self-test included.
An easy-to-read book that gives profiles for all sixteen personality types.
This book is written primarily to help teachers counsel students, but it
applicable for other related uses.
This book (originally written in the early 1920's) inspired Briggs & Myers to
create the MBTI test. If you've only read Please Understand Me, then you'll
have some trouble making the correlation.
A bizarre, but intriguing attempt to "correct" the MBTI's inherently 'F' focus
to a 'hyper-T' perspective.
It comes out roughly 8 times a year, and costs $16 for a year's subscription;
I've found it worth the money. Recent topics include "Mistakes When Teaching
Type", "Spending and Saving", and "Making Love"
One of the few outlets for research on the MBTI as 'real' personality
psychologists usually don't publish on it.
CAPT
2815 NW 13th Street
Suite 401
Gainesville, FL 32609
1-800-777-CAPT
An audiocassette package consisting of verbatim, unedited presentations from a
seminar at the Holiday Inn, March 4&5, 1989, by Dr. Eve Delunas. Ordering
information: InfoMedix, Garden Grove, CA 92643, (714) 530-3454.
Number one goal in life: To get one of my posts submitted to
alt.humor.best-of-usenet
Your
Futures Links Tomorrows story today: Wiredbrain's Reports from
the future: Copies
of the SYNERGY JOURNALS
sent
by request: pflaump@wiredbrain.com
Peter
E. Pflaum Ph.D. , Headmaster GLOBAL_VILLAGE_SCHOOLHOUSE 225 Robinson Road,
New Smyrna Beach, FL 32169 (904) 428-1355
DESCRIPTION OF THE FOUR SCALES
PREFERRED VOCABULARY FOR EACH OF THE FOUR SCALES
Extroversion, E (75% of Population) Introversion, I (25% of Population)
=================================== ===================================
sociability territoriality
breadth depth
external internal
extensive intensive
interaction concentration
expenditure of energy conservation of energy
interest in external events interest in internal reaction
multiplicity of relationships limited relationships
Sensing, S (75% of Population) Intuition, N (25% of Population)
============================== ================================
experience hunches
past future
realistic speculative
perspiration inspiration
actual possible
down-to-earth head-in-clouds
utility fantasy
fact fiction
practicality ingenuity
sensible imaginative
Thinking, T (50% of Population) Feeling, F (50% of Population)
=============================== ===============================
objective subjective
principles values
policy social values
laws extenuating circumstances
criterion intimacy
firmness persuasion
impersonal personal
justice humane
categories harmony
standards good or bad
critique appreciate
analysis sympathy
allocation devotion
Judgement, J (50% of Population) Perception, P (50% of Population)
================================ =================================
settled pending
decided gather more data
fixed flexible
plan ahead adapt as you go
run one's life let life happen
closure open options
decision-making treasure hunting
planned open ended
completed emergent
decisive tentative
wrap it up something will turn up
urgency there's plenty of time
deadline! what deadline?
get show on the road let's wait and see...
A SHORT SUMMARY OF THE SIXTEEN PERSONALITY TYPES
CORRELATION OF PERSONALITY TYPING TO THE FOUR TEMPERAMENTS
RESOURCE MATERIALS ON PERSONALITY TYPING
BOOKS
Please Understand Me, An Essay on Temperament Styles, by David Keirsey and
Marilyn Bates. Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, P.O. Box 2748, Del Mar,
CA 92014 (619-632-1575).
Portraits of Temperament, David Keirsey. Prometheus Nemesis Book Company,
P.O. Box 2748, Del Mar, CA 92014 (619-632-1575), 1987.
Gifts Differing, Isabel Briggs-Myers (with Peter Myers). Consulting
Psychologists Press, 1980 ISBN 0-89106-011-1 (pb) 0-89106-015-4 (hb).
Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers Briggs Type
Indicator, by Isabel Briggs-Myers and Mary H. McCaulley. Consulting
Psychologists Press, 1985.
LifeTypes, by Sandra Hirsh and Jean Kummerow, ISBN 0-446-38823-8 USA and
ISBN 0-446-38824-6 Canada. Warner Books, Inc., 1989.
Facing Your Type, George J. Schemel and James A. Borbely. Published by
Typofile Press, Church Road, Box 223, Wernersville, PA 19565.
Type Talk. Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen. Bantam Doubleday Dell
Publishing Group, Inc. (Tilden Press also mentioned.) ISBN 0-385-29828-59.
Type Talk at Work. Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen. ISBN 0-385-30174-X.
Type Watch. Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen.
The Leadership Equation. Lee Barr and Norma Barr.
Eaking Press, Austin, Texas. 1989.
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Organizations. Sandra Krebs Hirsh.
Consulting Psychological Press, Inc., Palo Alto, CA. 1985.
People Types and Tiger Stripes. Gordon Lawrence. Available from Center
for Application of Psychological Type, Gainesville, Florida.
ISBN 0-935652-08-6.
Working Together. Olaf Isachsen and Linda Berens.
New World Management Press, Coronado, CA. 1988.
From Image to Likeness -- A Jungian Path in the Gospel http://www.wiredbrain.com/documents/JOURney, W. Harold
Grant, Magdala Thompson and Thomas E. Clarke. Paulist Press, 545 Island
Road, Ramsey, NJ 07446. ISBN: 0-8091-2552-8, 1983. This book deals with
people's spiritual growth vis a vis personality types.
Prayer and Temperament, by Michael and Norrisey. Other bibliographic
information not known at present.
Personality Types and Religious Leadership, by Oswald and Kroeger.
Available from the Alban Institute, 4125 Nebraska Ave NW, Washington, D.C.,
20016. Phone -- 1-800-457-2674. Other bibliographic information not known
at present.
Psychological Types, C.G. Jung, H.G. Baynes (translator). Bollingen Series,
Princeton U.P., 1971 ISBN 0-691-01813-8 (pb) 0-691-09770-4 (hb).
An Introduction To Theories of Personality, B.R. Hergenhahn. Prentice-Hall,
New Jersey, 1990.
An Empirical Investigation of the Jungian Typology, by Leon Gorlow, Norman R.
Simonson, and Herbert Krauss. In Theories of Personality, Primary Sources
and Research, editors: Gardner Lindzey, Calvin S. Hall, Martin Manosevitz,
Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Florida, 1988.
The Measurement of Learning Style: A Critique of Four Assessment Tools,
Timothy J. Sewall, University of Wisconsin, 1986.
Dichotomies of the Mind: A System Science Model of the Mind and Personality,
Walter Lowen (with Lawrence Miike). John Wiley, 1982 ISBN 0-471-08331-3.
PERIODICAL LITERATURE
The Type Reporter. Susan Scanlon, Editor. For Subscription information,
mail to: 524 North Paxton Street, Alexandria, VA 22304. (703) 823-3730.
/DOCUMENTS/JOURnal of Psychological Type. The official research http://www.wiredbrain.com/documents/ JOURNAL of the
Association for Psychological Type, 9140 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, MO 64114.
Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY). Has lists of references to articles in
peer-reviewed http://www.wiredbrain.com/documents/ JOURNALs in which the MBTI test is used. An excellent review of
MBTI is given by Anthony DeVito in the 9th MMY, and two additional reviews
in the 10th MMY. The recently published 11th MMY does not include these.
The MMY are available in the reference section of most college and university
libraries.
OTHER
Consulting Psychologists Press is the publishing arm of the Center for
Applications of Psychological Type (CAPT). It distributes the official MBTI
tests and official interpretation guides, a thick Atlas of Types which gives
empirical type distributions for a wide range of population categories
(e.g., policemen, system analysts, high-school students), and many studies.
CAPT puts out a catalog of available resources. CAPT can be reached at:
"Madness and Temperament: A Systems View of Psycho/documents/pathos/pathology and Treatment"
--
Charter Member --->>> INFJ Club.
If you're dying to know what INFJ means, be brave, e-mail me, I'll send info.
=============================================================================
| Jon Noring | noring@netcom.com | |
| JKN International | IP : 192.100.81.100 | FRED'S GOURMET CHOCOLATE |
| 1312 Carlton Place | Phone : (510) 294-8153 | CHIPS - World's Best! |
| Livermore, CA 94550 | V-Mail: (510) 417-4101 | |
=============================================================================
Who are you? Read alt.psychology.personality! That's where the action is.
Converted to HTML by Jonathan Magid, SunSITE Admin, jem@sunsite.unc.edu